Alright, folks, gather around the digital campfire because we need to have a chat. Imagine it's 2050, and you’re explaining to your grandkids how we once had presidents who could remember the moon landing as if it were yesterday. But instead of reveling in nostalgia, let’s ask: Should the age of both presidential candidates be a concern for voters in the upcoming US presidential election?
Cue the ominous background music.
Age Isn’t Just a Number
Let’s cut to the chase: Age matters. And not just in the “my knees hurt when it rains” way. We’re talking cognitive sharpness, energy levels, and the ability to adapt to rapid changes. The current frontrunners, who shall remain nameless because we all know who they are, are both well into their seventies and beyond. We’re essentially looking at candidates who would be more comfortable listening to Elvis on vinyl than discussing TikTok’s impact on modern marketing.
Here’s the deal: The world isn’t slowing down. Technology is advancing at warp speed, social norms are evolving, and new global challenges are emerging daily. We need a leader who isn’t just experienced but is also agile and forward-thinking. And while age brings wisdom, it sometimes struggles with speed and innovation.
Cognitive Decline: A Cruel Companion
Age and cognitive decline are like peanut butter and jelly—they often come together, whether we like it or not. It’s a natural part of aging, like wrinkles or the inexplicable love for Werther’s Originals. As we age, our cognitive functions—memory, attention, and processing speed—begin to decline. And when you’re the leader of the free world, that’s kind of a big deal.
Imagine a scenario where a major global crisis hits, and our president needs to make rapid, high-stakes decisions. The ability to process information quickly and accurately can be the difference between a diplomatic resolution and a global catastrophe. A younger, more cognitively agile leader might have the upper hand in such situations.
Energy Levels: Running the Marathon
Being president isn’t a 9-to-5 job; it’s a 24/7 marathon. The leader of the United States needs to have the stamina to handle endless meetings, constant travel, and the perpetual stress of making decisions that affect millions of lives. It’s not a job for the faint-hearted—or the faint-bodied.
Younger candidates typically have higher energy levels, which can translate to more effective leadership. They’re more likely to engage with new technologies, be active on social media (a vital communication tool in modern politics), and maintain a rigorous schedule without needing a midday nap.
Adaptability: Embracing the New World
Our world is changing faster than you can say “climate change.” From technological advancements to shifting geopolitical landscapes, the ability to adapt and evolve is crucial for any leader. Older candidates, having grown up in a different era, might struggle more with these rapid changes. They might be more set in their ways, less willing to embrace new ideas, or simply out of touch with the concerns of younger generations.
A president who can’t keep up with the pace of change is a liability. We need someone who not only understands the current issues but is also prepared to tackle future challenges head-on.
The Wisdom Argument: Devil’s Advocate
Now, before you start thinking I’m ageist, let’s consider the other side of the coin. Age brings experience, wisdom, and a wealth of knowledge that younger candidates might lack. An older president has likely seen and dealt with a wide range of issues over their career, giving them a deep well of experience to draw from.
Moreover, age can bring a sense of stability and reassurance. Voters might feel more comfortable with a seasoned politician who has been around the block a few times. There’s something to be said for a steady hand in turbulent times.
The Verdict: A Balanced Approach
So, should age be a concern for voters? Yes, but it shouldn’t be the only concern. Age is one of many factors to consider when choosing a leader. Cognitive sharpness, energy levels, and adaptability are crucial, but so are experience, wisdom, and stability.
What we need is a balanced approach. Voters should consider the full picture, weighing the pros and cons of each candidate’s age and overall capabilities. We need a leader who combines the best of both worlds: the wisdom of experience with the vitality of youth.
In the end, it’s not just about how many candles are on the birthday cake. It’s about who can lead us into the future with strength, vision, and resilience. So, as you head to the polls, keep in mind that while age matters, it’s the whole package that counts.
And remember, whether our next president is rocking gray hair or still clinging to their youthful exuberance, the ultimate goal is to elect someone who will steer our nation toward a brighter future. Age is just one piece of the puzzle. Let’s make sure we’re looking at the entire picture.
Hi there, I’m Brian, and in addition to this Substack, I’m writing the proverbial (no surprise here) sequel to Talk Tech To Me. I take on the stress and strain of complex technology concepts and simplify them for the modern recruiter.